Brussels

Nanox Imaging PLC v David Schick. A reminder of Gibraltar’s continued use of Brussels Ia (and anti-suit granted despite that Regulation). – Go Health Pro

by
Nanox Imaging PLC v David Schick. A reminder of Gibraltar’s continued use of Brussels Ia (and anti-suit granted despite that Regulation). – Go Health Pro

In Nanox Imaging PLC v David Schick 2024/GSC/043, Happold J at the Gibraltar Supreme Court dealt with applications for anti-suit, forum non conveniens and case management stays. Claimant ‘Nanox Gibraltar’ is a Gibraltar registered company which until September 2019 carried on business in the field of medical imaging technology. Defendant is an electrical engineer and a US … Read more

Matthews v MACIF. A uncommon and intensive dialogue on refusal of recognition below Brussels I and loads of grounds resulting in refusal of recognition of a French judgment issued in absentia. – Cyber Information

by
Matthews v MACIF. A uncommon and intensive dialogue on refusal of recognition below Brussels I and loads of grounds resulting in refusal of recognition of a French judgment issued in absentia. – Cyber Information

Thanks very a lot confrère Lucian Ilie for sharing copy of the hitherto unreported Thomas Hilton Matthews v Mutuelle Assurance des Commercants et Industriels de France [2023] EWHC 2175 (KB) – Matthews v MACIF for brief. Maître Ilie efficiently secured a Excessive Courtroom judgment (Ritchie J sitting on attraction) overturning registration with a view to … Read more

x