forum contractus for software /IT services online. – gavc law – geert van calster – Go Health Pro

forum contractus for software /IT services online. – gavc law – geert van calster – Go Health Pro

I reviewed Richard de la Tour’s Opinion in C-526/23 VariusSystems digital solutions GmbH v GR Inhaberin B & G here. The CJEU held at the end of November, essentially following it and being very brief in doing so. The operative part of the judgment reads The second indent of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of … Read more

a good example of a poorly drafted choice of court clause (and wrong High Court conclusion IMO). – gavc law – geert van calster – Go Health Pro

a good example of a poorly drafted choice of court clause (and wrong High Court conclusion IMO). – gavc law – geert van calster – Go Health Pro

There is a gale force wind out there and the girls and I are housebound: so I thought I’ld clear the blog queue a bit. It is generally not good practice to post poorly drafted choice of court provisions yet once in a while it helps illustrate what I often say in class: that even … Read more

finding of exclusive jurisdiction in ISDA Master Agreement, rejection of ultra vires arguments and an unlikely prima facie resurrection of pre-EU membership bilateral conventions. – gavc law – geert van calster – Go Health Pro

finding of exclusive jurisdiction in ISDA Master Agreement, rejection of ultra vires arguments and an unlikely prima facie resurrection of pre-EU membership bilateral conventions. – gavc law – geert van calster – Go Health Pro

Dexia v Patrimonio del Trentino [2024] EWHC 2717 (KB) echoes Banca Intesa v Venezia  in some of its main issues. It features capacity of foreign corporations to enter into legal transaction, relevance of lex incorporationis, validity of choice of court clause, and the impact of Brexit, with the judge prima facie accepting resurrection of the … Read more

Rome II locus damni for misrepresentation. The High Court in Jaffe v Greybull. – gavc law – geert van calster – Go Health Pro

Rome II locus damni for misrepresentation. The High Court in Jaffe v Greybull. – gavc law – geert van calster – Go Health Pro

In Jaffe & Anor Greybull Capital LLP & Ors [2024] EWHC 2534 (Comm) one of the issues was the applicable law for misrepresentation about the source of funds being injected into a company. Cockerill J, applying Article 4 Rome II and referring to earlier judgments all reviewed on the blog, in the end [300] holds … Read more

classifying a claim as ‘civil and commercial’. – gavc law – geert van calster – Go Health Pro

classifying a claim as ‘civil and commercial’. – gavc law – geert van calster – Go Health Pro

In my August conflict of laws exams I asked the students the following question: In Case C-494/23 Maha, facts are as follows. On 19 August 2017, applicants purchased a motor vehicle in Germany. On 12 September 2017, the vehicle was seized by the Police of the Czech Republic on the ground that it is the … Read more