court

Expanding the implied license into the analogue: The German Federal Court of Justice on interior design choices and their copyright consequences – Go Health Pro

by
Expanding the implied license into the analogue: The German Federal Court of Justice on interior design choices and their copyright consequences – Go Health Pro

Image by Vincent Ciro from Pixabay On 11 September 2024, the German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) had to decide on the question of whether photos or videos shared online featuring in their background a photo wallpaper protected by copyright are lawful under an implied license, or if an express authorization of such reproductions is … Read more

Court of Justice ruling extends right to family reunification for refugee minors – Go Health Pro

by
Court of Justice ruling extends right to family reunification for refugee minors – Go Health Pro

Chiara De Capitani (PhD) is a linguist agent at the European Commission and member of Amnesty International Belgique francophone’s Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (OSIG) coordination. The views, thoughts and opinions expressed in this paper are solely that of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policy or opinion of the European Commission … Read more

Applicable law in follow-on competition cases. 3 Opinions of the AG at the Dutch Supreme court. On Rome II ratione temporis for continuous torts; on assignment; and on ‘markets affected’. – Go Health Pro

by
Applicable law in follow-on competition cases. 3 Opinions of the AG at the Dutch Supreme court. On Rome II ratione temporis for continuous torts; on assignment; and on ‘markets affected’. – Go Health Pro

Three Opinions of Vlas AG at the Dutch Supreme Court dated 5 April 2024 but published today discuss issues of applicable law in competition follow-on cases. See also my earlier posts on Air Cargo and Palink. CJEU authority cited includes Concurrence, Nintendo, Tibor Trans, CDC, flyLAL. ECLI:NL:PHR:2024:561 is the Palink case in the Truck Cartel: … Read more

Who is bound by Choice of Court Agreements in Bills of Lading? Guest blog on CJEU Maersk by Dr Mukarrum Ahmed. – gavc law – geert van calster – Go Health Pro

by
Who is bound by Choice of Court Agreements in Bills of Lading? Guest blog on CJEU Maersk by Dr Mukarrum Ahmed. – gavc law – geert van calster – Go Health Pro

This guest post was authored by Dr Mukarrum Ahmed, Barrister (Lincoln’s Inn), and Lecturer in Business Law & Director of PG Admissions at Lancaster University Law School. I am most grateful to Dr Ahmed for complementing my earlier post on the CJEU case discussed, Joined Cases C‑345/22 and C‑347/22 Maersk.   According to the doctrine of … Read more

Nicholls v Mapfre. The Court of Appeal takes an ‘intertwinedness’ approach to “evidence and procedure” in Rome II. – Go Health Pro

by
Nicholls v Mapfre. The Court of Appeal takes an ‘intertwinedness’ approach to “evidence and procedure” in Rome II. – Go Health Pro

Nicholls & Anor v Mapfre Espana Compania De Seguros Y Reaseguros SA [2024] EWCA Civ 718 is the unsuccessful appeal against Sedgwick v Mapfre Espana Compania De Seguros Y Reaseguros Sa [2022] EWHC 2704 (KB) which I discuss here and against Nicholls v Mapfre and Sonia Woodward v Mapfre [2023] EWHC 1031 (KB) which I discuss … Read more

x