Rediscovering the Duty to Abstain – EJIL: Talk! – Go Health Pro

Rediscovering the Duty to Abstain – EJIL: Talk! – Go Health Pro

Background

The principle nemo iudex in causa sua—no one should be a judge in their own cause—has deep roots in international law, yet its codification in the UN Charter has often been disregarded. Article 27(3) requires a State that is a party to a dispute to abstain from voting on related Security Council resolutions under Chapter VI, provided the matter is non-procedural. Although long viewed as dormant, the Russia–Ukraine war has revived interest in this principle.

The last notable compliance with Article 27(3) dates back to the Eichmann case in 1961, when Argentina abstained. Since then, the rule’s relevance has been questioned, particularly amid Russia’s repeated vetoes of Ukraine-related resolutions following its 2014 annexation of Crimea and the 2022 invasion. Given Russia’s clear status as a ‘party to the dispute,’ scholars and practitioners have seen an opportunity to reassert Article 27(3) and to crystallize a workable definition of that term.

Read more

Judges Under Stress and the Duty to Resist – Go Health Pro

Judges Under Stress and the Duty to Resist – Go Health Pro

What US Judges Can Learn From the German Experience The Trump administration is engaged in a battle over the “mode of rule” of the American society. During his presidential campaign, in March 2023, Donald Trump announced a 10-point plan to dismantle the “deep state”. According to the Claremont Institute, a think tank that works “to … Read more

Shifting the burden of proof and a duty to assist the Court (a duty of candour?) – Go Health Pro

Shifting the burden of proof and a duty to assist the Court (a duty of candour?) – Go Health Pro

  Antje Kunst* * Antje Kunst is an international lawyer and barrister of Garden Court North Chambers, admitted to the Bar of England and Wales, and the Bar of Berlin, advising and representing individuals in a wide range of matters related to fundamental rights within the CFSP and other fields. She has appeared in numerous cases … Read more

More on the Commission’s duty to assess State aid measures’ compatibility with EU procurement law — AG Medina Opinion in Paks II (C-59/23 P) — How to Crack a Nut – Go Health Pro

More on the Commission’s duty to assess State aid measures’ compatibility with EU procurement law — AG Medina Opinion in Paks II (C-59/23 P) — How to Crack a Nut – Go Health Pro

The extent and limits to the Commission’s duty to assess the compatibility of State aid measures with other rules of EU internal market law, and public procurement rules in particular, continues to heat up (see earlier comment here). According to the Court’s press release, today’s Opinion of AG Medina in Austria v Commission (Centrale nucléaire … Read more

Further confusion on duty of the European Commission to assess State aid measures’ compatibility with other rules of EU internal market law (C‑490/23 P) — How to Crack a Nut – Go Health Pro

Further confusion on duty of the European Commission to assess State aid measures’ compatibility with other rules of EU internal market law (C‑490/23 P) — How to Crack a Nut – Go Health Pro

The Court of Justice has been recently presented with some cases where a State aid measure was argued to have (not) infringed EU internal market law and should thus (not) have been authorised by the European Commission. These cases raise the common issue of the Commission’s duty to assess proposed State aid measures for compliance … Read more