OpEd

Op-Ed: “Cases C‑555/22 P, C‑556/22 P and C‑564/22 P UK and ITV v Commission: just like Apple, except completely different?” – Go Health Pro

by
Op-Ed: “Cases C‑555/22 P, C‑556/22 P and C‑564/22 P UK and ITV v Commission: just like Apple, except completely different?” – Go Health Pro

This is the fifth Op-Ed of a Symposium on the Apple State Aid case (C‑465/20 P).  Previous Op-Eds have been authored by Romero J. S. Tavares , Scott Wilkie, Svitlana Buriak and Juan Jorge Piernas López.  Introduction That’s all folks! The UK Controlled Foreign Company (‘CFC’) judgment (C‑555/22 P, C‑556/22 P and C‑564/22 P), handed down by the Court … Read more

Op-Ed: “Harvest Time or Apple Grand Finale” – Go Health Pro

by
Op-Ed: “Cases C‑555/22 P, C‑556/22 P and C‑564/22 P UK and ITV v Commission: just like Apple, except completely different?” – Go Health Pro

This is the third Op-Ed of a Symposium on the Apple State Aid case (C‑465/20 P).  Previous Op-Eds have been authored by Romero J. S. Tavares and Scott Wilkie. More Op-Eds will follow soon in EU Law Live. The decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘the Court of Justice’ or the ‘Court’) in … Read more

Op-Ed: “‘Wrong‘ Questions, misguided Answers, regulatory Distortion?” – Go Health Pro

by
Op-Ed: “Cases C‑555/22 P, C‑556/22 P and C‑564/22 P UK and ITV v Commission: just like Apple, except completely different?” – Go Health Pro

This is the second Op-Ed of a Symposium on the Apple State Aid case (C‑465/20 P). A previous Op-Ed has been authored by Romero J. S. Tavares. More Op-Eds will follow soon in EU Law Live. The Apple Decision Simpliciter – A Blinkered Approach? There is an adage:  ‘You get answers to the questions you ask’.  … Read more

Op-Ed: “The poisoned Apple: is the Court of Justice seeking Justice through legal Misinterpretation?” – Go Health Pro

by
Op-Ed: “Cases C‑555/22 P, C‑556/22 P and C‑564/22 P UK and ITV v Commission: just like Apple, except completely different?” – Go Health Pro

This is the first Op-Ed of a Symposium on the Apple State Aid case ( C‑465/20 P). More Op-Eds will follow soon in EU Law Live.   The recent final ruling on the Apple State-Aid case surprised many commentators, including this author, who trusted the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘the Court’) would be a … Read more

Op-Ed: “(Not quite) In Defence of the Article 255 Panel” – Go Health Pro

by
Op-Ed: “Cases C‑555/22 P, C‑556/22 P and C‑564/22 P UK and ITV v Commission: just like Apple, except completely different?” – Go Health Pro

This is the fifth Op-Ed of a Symposium on “The Selection of EU Judges and the 255 Committee”. Previous Op-Eds were authored by Joseph H.H. Weiler; Giuliano Amato, Marta Cartabia, Dieter Grimm, Miguel Poiares Maduro, Rui Manuel Moura Ramos & José Luis Da Cruz Vilaça; Alberto Alemanno and François-Xavier Millet. More Op-Eds on this topic will be published soon on EU Law Live The authority accumulated over … Read more