Applicable law in follow-on competition cases. Dutch Supreme Court refers to CJEU on the issue of continued infringement, with side role for Rome II. – Go Health Pro

Applicable law in follow-on competition cases. Dutch Supreme Court refers to CJEU on the issue of continued infringement, with side role for Rome II. – Go Health Pro

I discussed Vlas AG (at the Dutch Supreme Court)’s opinion in the Air Cargo case here. The Dutch Supreme Court today has decided to refer to the CJEU. The specific questions referred, concern the (effet utile of) the EU’s rules on effective enforcement of EU competition law and the qualification of continuous infringement of competition … Read more

Nicholls v Mapfre. The Court of Appeal takes an ‘intertwinedness’ approach to “evidence and procedure” in Rome II. – Go Health Pro

Nicholls v Mapfre. The Court of Appeal takes an ‘intertwinedness’ approach to “evidence and procedure” in Rome II. – Go Health Pro

Nicholls & Anor v Mapfre Espana Compania De Seguros Y Reaseguros SA [2024] EWCA Civ 718 is the unsuccessful appeal against Sedgwick v Mapfre Espana Compania De Seguros Y Reaseguros Sa [2022] EWHC 2704 (KB) which I discuss here and against Nicholls v Mapfre and Sonia Woodward v Mapfre [2023] EWHC 1031 (KB) which I discuss … Read more

x