Supreme

As reported by The Daily Record, Lauren DiMartino argued before the Supreme Court of Maryland that landlords’ use of a minimum income requirement for voucher holders violates the HOME Act’s prohibition on source-of-income discrimination. – Go Health Pro

by
As reported by The Daily Record, Lauren DiMartino argued before the Supreme Court of Maryland that landlords’ use of a minimum income requirement for voucher holders violates the HOME Act’s prohibition on source-of-income discrimination. – Go Health Pro

Attorney Lauren DiMartino argued a fair housing case before the Supreme Court of Maryland in Annapolis on May 5, challenging landlords’ use of minimum-income screening policies to discriminate against voucher holders, as reported on by The Daily Record. The case is Katrina Hare v. David S. Brown Enterprises, Ltd. Landlord David S. Brown Enterprises denied … Read more

CLD v Hori Ltd. Belgian Supreme Court holds 2005 Choice of Court Convention applies to UK uninterrupted since 2015. – gavc law – geert van calster – Go Health Pro

by
CLD v Hori Ltd. Belgian Supreme Court holds 2005 Choice of Court Convention applies to UK uninterrupted since 2015. – gavc law – geert van calster – Go Health Pro

If you do use the blog for research or database purposes, citation would be appreciated, to the blog as a whole and /or to specific blog posts. Many have suggested I should turn the blog into a paid for, subscription service however I have resisted doing so. Proper reference to how the blog is useful … Read more

Alalääkkölä v Palmer: New Zealand Supreme Court confirms copyright is relationship property – Go Health Pro

by
Alalääkkölä v Palmer: New Zealand Supreme Court confirms copyright is relationship property – Go Health Pro

Image by Martina Bulková from Pixabay In March 2025 the New Zealand Supreme Court confirmed that copyright is relationship property, to be divided accordingly when a qualifying relationship ends. This decision has significant implications for copyright practice in New Zealand, and jurisdictions with similar regulatory frameworks for IP and family property (like the United Kingdom). … Read more

German Federal Supreme Court rejects copyright protection for Birkenstock sandals. – Go Health Pro

by
German Federal Supreme Court rejects copyright protection for Birkenstock sandals. – Go Health Pro

Image by wowbee from Pixabay In a decision of 20 February 2025 the German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) denied copyright protection as a work of applied art for two sandal designs. The ruling clarifies the scope of protection under German and EU law for works of applied art. According to the BGH, works of applied … Read more

German Federal Supreme Court reject copyright protection for Birkenstock sandals. – Go Health Pro

by
German Federal Supreme Court rejects copyright protection for Birkenstock sandals. – Go Health Pro

Image by wowbee from Pixabay In a decision of 20 February 2025 the German Federal Supreme Court (BGH) denied copyright protection as a work of applied art for two sandal designs. The ruling clarifies the scope of protection under German and EU law for works of applied art. According to the BGH, works of applied … Read more